Skip to content
  • Restoring a healthy research environment for the science of tomorrow

Ariel Fernandez Science and Context

Restoring a healthy NIH research environment for scientific pursuit.

Tag: Scientific retractions

Written by Weishi MengSeptember 11, 2015May 31, 2016

The demise of peer review in scientific publication

It is widely felt that peer review in scientific publishing is failing and it seems journal editors and academic authorities have only themselves to blame. Nature started a debate on the subject but it is felt that the point was not made somehow. Every time a journal publishes an alert note or an expression of […]

Written by Weishi MengNovember 22, 2014May 31, 2016

Retraction Watch tracks down scientific corruption. Huh?

We would like to believe that people associated with the practice of science regard the process of tracking down corruption in research as a worthy undertaking. We better be careful with what exactly we wish for because the emerging picture, as it stands today, is looking ugly and getting uglier: Corruption is far more frequent […]

Written by Weishi MengOctober 8, 2014December 7, 2014

Retraction Watch’s Fierce Retort to Nature

Retraction Watch seems to be well on its way to leave a mark on the academic establishment and dictate policy on research ethics. Its posts so often tinged by anger and resentment have gained enormous traction on the web, exposing disturbing human traits. This should not come as a surprise, after all, one man’s sorrow […]

Powered by WordPress.com.
Loading Comments...