Skip to content
  • Restoring a healthy research environment for the science of tomorrow

Ariel Fernandez – Science Transparency – COVID 19 Cover-up

Restoring a healthy NIH research environment for scientific pursuit.

Tag: Misconduct

Written by Weishi MengOctober 9, 2015October 11, 2015

Paolo Macchiarini portrayed by Retraction Watch: defamed, probably, vindicated? Never!

As the peer review system appears to be failing and bogus research keeps surfacing, post publication peer review (PPPR) is becoming a necessity. The problem is who conducts PPPR (*). Certainly an indiscriminate blog run by nonscientists nudging journals into reaction, where anyone can voice their opinion or make misconduct allegations is not the way […]

Written by Weishi MengSeptember 24, 2014September 25, 2014

Retraction Watch, PubPeer and other Haters and their Quest for Transparency

Scientific papers have been challenged since the early days of the Acta Eruditorum and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. For hundreds of years, the rules of fair play and transparency dictate that the challenger must seek publication of his/her adverse comments which must be granted pursuant to a favorable peer review conducted by […]

Written by Weishi MengSeptember 18, 2014September 21, 2014

Debunking Retraction Watch and its Easy Route to Fame

Science is undeniably hard. First you come to grips with failure in the lab and when you finally believe you got it right, another front opens up: the quest to pass peer review and get your findings published in a good journal. These days, a new cloud looms over the embattled researcher right at the end […]

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...