Skip to content
  • Restoring a healthy research environment for the science of tomorrow

Science and Context

Restoring a healthy NIH research environment for scientific pursuit.

Category: Scientific publication

Written by Weishi MengNovember 22, 2014May 31, 2016

Retraction Watch tracks down scientific corruption. Huh?

We would like to believe that people associated with the practice of science regard the process of tracking down corruption in research as a worthy undertaking. We better be careful with what exactly we wish for because the emerging picture, as it stands today, is looking ugly and getting uglier: Corruption is far more frequent […]

Written by Weishi MengOctober 8, 2014December 7, 2014

Retraction Watch’s Fierce Retort to Nature

Retraction Watch seems to be well on its way to leave a mark on the academic establishment and dictate policy on research ethics. Its posts so often tinged by anger and resentment have gained enormous traction on the web, exposing disturbing human traits. This should not come as a surprise, after all, one man’s sorrow […]

Written by Weishi MengSeptember 24, 2014September 25, 2014

Retraction Watch, PubPeer and other Haters and their Quest for Transparency

Scientific papers have been challenged since the early days of the Acta Eruditorum and the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. For hundreds of years, the rules of fair play and transparency dictate that the challenger must seek publication of his/her adverse comments which must be granted pursuant to a favorable peer review conducted by […]

Posts navigation

Newer posts
Powered by WordPress.com.
Loading Comments...