Skip to content
  • Restoring a healthy research environment for the science of tomorrow

Ariel Fernandez – Science Transparency – COVID 19 Cover-up

Restoring a healthy NIH research environment for scientific pursuit.

Category: Anonymous Peer Review

Written by Weishi MengSeptember 22, 2022September 28, 2022

The Scam of Scientific Publishing and the Wild West of Post Publication Peer Review

   Have you ever met a top scientist who is also an active journal editor? After years of patent litigation this question keeps coming up when seeking for technical help. The answer is: only seldom, since great minds usually have little interest in getting distracted. The consequences of this inverted selection are immediately apparent: deep […]

Written by Weishi MengMay 28, 2018June 9, 2018

The Web-Based Sewage of Science Fed by a Failed Peer Review System

We love science, we also know that getting and keeping our scientific work published in a good venue can be an arduous task. This is true now more than ever due to a lack of leadership in the scientific establishment and to the advent in 2010 of a new player in the game: the angry […]

Written by Weishi MengFebruary 20, 2017February 20, 2017

Anonymous peer review is fine, while anonymous post-publication review is not

When a scientist submits a paper for publication to a journal, he entrusts the journal editor with the task of finding peers would be able to review the paper and are knowledgeable enough to assess its scientific merit. The names of the reviewers are typically concealed to the author. The intent is to grant the […]

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...